Funnily enough, I just re-watched all three “Scream†films this week. I love those films (well, not “Scream 3†so much – that’s a bit of a Frankensteinien effort). They’re so damn smart. And funny. And some of the performances in those films are gold – ridicule me, but I think Matthew Lillard is an absolute doozie in the first film! And Jamie Kennedy has never been better! (Actually, he’s never been tolerable since)
I envision it sucking – hoping it’s not of the “I’ll Always Know What You Did Last Summer†vein – but look forward to the just-announced “Scream 4â€.
This one has been on the drawing board for a while. The Weinstein’s reached out to the original cast and crew (including Wes Craven) a couple of years ago, to see whether they’d return for a fourth film, and although most of them refused to return – the Cox-Arquette team is apparently keen; and why wouldn’t they be? – Bob and Harvey seemingly still think it’s a viable idea.
The real reason behind the sudden addition of “Scream 4†to the Weinstein Schedule, according to a chum of Moviehole (and WC insider), is “That the Weinstein’s have to stick with some sure-things now – they need the money. They’ve tried to do different things, stay away from sequels and so on, but that hasn’t worked. They’ve been in the red for a while. You’ll start to see a lot of sequels and remakes out of TWC over the next couple of yearsâ€.
As for Craven returning in some capacity? “He always said it depends on the script. But I’d say no chanceâ€.
I’m assuming that Neve Campbell is sticking to her guns and ruling out a Sydney Prescott return, and that the new film will be headlined by David Arquette and Courteney Cox-Arquette. But then again, the press release stating that “Scream 4†is in the works does state that it’s also a ‘restart’ – so it’s possible we’ll see all new characters this time around.
First thing they need to do : Get Kevin Williamson back to write it.